Art and money: constitutional rights in the private sphere?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Do Constitutional Rights Matter?∗
The critique of constitutions as mere parchment barriers is as old as the practice of writing them down. Yet states put a good deal of energy into drafting constitutions and some, inevitably, do so with the intention of abiding by their provisions. The purpose of the following article is to explore this possibility. I develop a theory of constitutional enforcement and test it using data spannin...
متن کاملThe Social Effective Factors Involved in Gender Stereotyping Believe between Private and Public Sphere
An important part of understanding women's and men's attitudes and behaviors is considering their ideas and opinions. Based on gender stereotyping of view women and men have different types of behavior, manner and characteristics. Both genders do their jobs differently. Stereotyping process focuses on ability and characteristics of women, and men are lack of them. On the other hand, it also f...
متن کاملPrivate Money
A random matching environment is constructed where banks mitigate a mismatch between the timing of investment payo¤s and when agents wish to consume. Claims on banks may serve as media of exchange, i.e. private money. Two problems can emerge with private money. First, there may exist welfaredominated equilibria where banks hold low-return assets. Second, private media of exchange may be subject...
متن کاملPrivate Money and Counterfeiting
P erhaps the most fundamental question in monetary economics pertains to the role of the government in providing money. A widely held view among economists is that the supply of media of exchange is an activity that should not be left to the private sector. Indeed, even Milton Friedman, who in most respects has viewed the economic role of the government quite narrowly, argues in Friedman (1960)...
متن کاملConstitutional rights and hypnotically elicited testimony.
Despite the former popularity of hypnosis as a way of "improving" eyewitness memory, many courts almost always regard the use of this testimony to be inadmissible, whereas others allow it only when strict procedural guidelines have been followed. Although the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a defendant's constitutional right to admit his own hypnotically elicited testimony, others have recognized...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
سال: 1998
ISSN: 0143-6503,1464-3820
DOI: 10.1093/ojls/18.1.61